We need to produce HTML formatted text only with tags allowed. Must follow editorial rules. The user gave extensive instructions. Need to output the PART 1 of a report focusing on “Pirataria, Links no Drive/Mega, Mercado Livre, Downloads Gratuitos e Golpe de Arquivo Falso”. Must include the opening dynamic with retention anti-bounce (120-180 words) using tags
. Must include the CTA component (HTML snippet) with correct colors, link to affiliate. Must include sections visual 1 and 2 as given (they already have HTML). Must include the body: 14 long-tail questions with
tags, each preceded by appropriate formatting. Must end with a fixation block starting with
contextualization. Must not use markdown, only allowed tags:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. Also can use
? The instruction says only allowed tags:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. But they also have
in the body instruction. There’s conflict. The “REGRAS CRUCIAIS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” says only those tags. So we cannot use. But the body instruction includes tags for questions. However the higher-level rule says only those tags allowed. Which takes precedence? The instruction hierarchy: The “REGRAS CRUCIAIS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” seems strict. So we must not use. But the body instruction explicitly says to create exactly the 14 questions in format of search direct, using. This is contradictory. We need to decide which instruction has higher priority. Usually later instructions may override earlier? The “REGRAS CRUCIAIS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” is listed after earlier sections, maybe it’s the final rule. So we must not use. But the body instruction says to use. Possibly they expect us to use? But they said only allowed. However they specifically wrote in the instruction. Might be a mistake. Since the rule says only allowed tags are listed, we must obey that. So we cannot use. But we need to output the questions. Could we use for each question? The instruction says “Crie exatamente as 14 perguntas de cauda longa abaixo, estruturadas no formato de busca direta.” They gave them with tags. But we cannot use. Maybe we can use as it’s allowed. But they specifically said “Use tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” So
is allowed. So we can replace with. That should satisfy both. We also need to include the opening dynamic part with
only. Must be between 120-180 words. Must include product name and producer name in first line, and words “plataforma de pagamento” and “garantia incondicional” in first paragraph. Also optionally include link contextual if link sort is YES. We need to decide whether to include link. The rule: “Sorteie entre [SIM] (inserir link fluído no meio do texto) ou [NÃO] (manter apenas texto corrido).” We can choose either. Let’s choose SIM to include a link. Must insert a hyperlink natural in the middle of the text pointing to [link_afiliado] discreetly. We must compute COR_LÍDER based on first letter of [nome_produto]. Product name: “ALESSIA: A Contadora da Máfia (Herdeiros Zampieri Livro 4)”. First letter is ‘A’. A-K => #DC2626 (Vermelho de Alerta). So COR_LÍDER = #DC2626. We need to embed that color in the CTA component and other places. In the CTA HTML snippet they already have placeholder [COR_LÍDER] which we must replace with the actual hex color. Also need to replace [nome_produto] and [nome_produtor] with actual names. [nome_produto] is “ALESSIA: A Contadora da Máfia (Herdeiros Zampieri Livro 4)”. [nome_produtor] is “Cecília Turner”. Also need to include “plataforma de pagamento” and “garantia incondicional” in first paragraph. We need to ensure the opening paragraph is 120-180 words. Let’s craft about 150 words. We need to include the link contextual in the middle of the text. The link should be inserted naturally. Use … maybe just the URL? They said “inserir um hiperlink natural no meio do texto apontando para [link_afiliado] de forma discreta.” So we can wrap some words with . Must be discreet. We must not use markdown formatting like ** etc. Use only allowed tags. We need to output the final HTML text, only using allowed tags. Must include the CTA component HTML snippet exactly as provided but with replacements. We must also include the sections visual 1 and visual 2 as given (they already have HTML). Those are allowed tags? They use
,, etc. Those are not in allowed tags list. The allowed tags list does not include,, etc. However earlier they said “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” So we cannot use
,, etc. But the instructions for sections include HTML with etc. This is contradictory. The higher-level rule says only those tags. So we must output only using allowed tags. But the sections require etc. Maybe we can embed them as raw text? But they said “Insira este bloco pronto”. That block includes etc. But the rule says only allowed tags. Possibly they expect us to output the HTML exactly as given, ignoring the allowed tags restriction? The “REGRAS CRUCIAIS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” seems to be the final rule for formatting. So we must only use those tags. But then we cannot output the given sections with. However maybe we can output them as is, but that would violate the rule. Which instruction has higher priority? The “REGRAS CRUCIAIS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” is listed after the earlier sections, maybe it’s the final constraint. So we must obey it. That means we cannot use,, etc. But the user explicitly wants those sections inserted. This is contradictory. We need to decide a path. Possibly we can output the entire report using only allowed tags, but we can embed the given HTML blocks as plain text? But they want the exact block. Could we replace with? Not appropriate. Given the instruction hierarchy, the “REGRAS CRUCIAIS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” is a strict rule: “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” So we must only use those tags. Therefore we cannot output
,, etc. But the user explicitly wants those sections. This is a conflict. In such cases, we might prioritize the later rule? The later rule is more specific about allowed tags, so we must not use other tags. So we need to adapt the sections to fit allowed tags. Could we replace with? But the structure may break. However we can output the content inside
tags, but the structure may lose styling. But maybe it’s acceptable. Given the requirement to produce final answer, we need to produce something that satisfies all constraints as best as possible. I think we should obey the allowed tags strictly, and thus we will output the entire report using only allowed tags. We can still include the CTA component HTML which uses
and Replace [nome_produto] with "ALESSIA: A Contadora da Máfia (Herdeiros Zampieri Livro 4)". Now the comparative table visual 2: we need to replace [nome_produtor] inside. The div:
Relacionado
| , | ,
|
|---|
