We need to produce PART 1 of a report based on given data, following strict rules. Must start with a
paragraph contextualizing, then proceed with sections as described. We must generate 10 questions in
format, each with answer: first line bold containing a practical tip, rest explaining step by step, ending with mention of [nome_produto] from [nome_produtor] as best tool/guide. We have to include up to 1-2 links total. The link must be exactly the given affiliate URL. Use it somewhere, maybe in CTA card or block. We must use only allowed HTML tags:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. No markdown, no
, no other tags. Also we cannot use etc? Wait spec says “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” So we can only use those tags. That means we cannot use
,, , etc. But earlier they said title of question must be. Conflict. The instruction says: “1. PROCESSAMENTO INTERNO (PROIBIDO EXIBIR) – Identifique a categoria do produto … 2. ABERTURA DINÂMICA … 3. CTA PRIMÁRIO … 4. SEÇÃO VISUAL … 5. CORPO: AS 10 PERGUNTAS DINÂMICAS … 6. BLOCO DE FECHAMENTO CONTEXTUAL COM LINK”. In step 5 they say generate 10 perguntas dinâmicas, and rule V40 says: “- Título da pergunta em (ex: “Como dar o primeiro passo para [ação do produto]?
“)”. So we must use
. But the later formatting rules say only allowed tags are
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. This is contradictory. However the higher-level instruction says “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML: 1. Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. 2. Todo parágrafo corrido deve estar encapsulado em tags
. Não use Markdown (*, **, #) e nunca use a tag
.” Thus we cannot use. But earlier they require. Which rule takes precedence? The later “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” is probably higher priority. So we cannot use. But they explicitly require for question titles. There’s conflict. We need to decide. Possibly we can use as the highest heading allowed. But they said “nunca use a tag“, but didn’t forbid or. However they said only allowed tags include. So we can use. But they said title must be. That’s contradictory. Maybe we can use and still satisfy “title in“? Not possible. Could we wrap but it’s not allowed? The instruction “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” is strict: only those tags allowed. So we must not use. But the V40 rule says title in. Might be a test of following higher-level instruction. I’d prioritize the “REGRAS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” as final instruction. So we should use for question titles, maybe they accept that as “title of question”. But they explicitly said. However they also said only allowed tags are those listed, which includes but not. So we cannot use. I think we should use to comply with allowed tags. But maybe we can use and still consider it a heading; they didn’t forbid but they said only allowed tags are those listed; is not listed, so it’s prohibited. So we must not use. We’ll use. We also need to include up to 1-2 links. Must use exactly the given URL. Use it maybe in CTA card or block. Must be exactly that URL. Use anchor tag . That’s allowed? Anchor tag not listed among allowed tags. They didn’t list as allowed. They only listed,
,,- , ,
| , | ,
|
|---|
