We need to produce the first part of an analytical review. Must start with a
paragraph (max 3 lines). Must include bullet points every 2 paragraphs. Exactly 1 affiliate link in the text using tag “Link_afiliado”. Also need a card CTA HTML block immediately after the contextualization. The card includes a link with href = Link_afiliado (the provided link). Must be exactly 1 link in the whole text (the CTA link). Also need exactly 1 affiliate link overall. So we can only have that link in the CTA button. But the instructions also say “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual no texto usando a tag “Link_afiliado” (ex: convidando para conferir a edição).” So there must be exactly 1 link in the text (including CTA?) Probably they want one link in the contextual part, but also the CTA includes a link. That might be considered extra. However they also say “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link de afiliado no texto”. That likely refers to the entire response, but then they also require a CTA button with a link. That would be a second link, causing conflict. We need to interpret: They want exactly 1 link overall, and that link must be placed in the CTA button. The instruction about “link contextual” may be part of the first part: “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual no texto”. But then they also require a CTA button with a link. Possibly they want the link to be the same as the CTA link, i.e., the contextual link is the same as the CTA button link? But they said “no texto” meaning within the text (the contextual part) we need a link. Then after that we have the CTA card which also contains a link. That would be two links. To satisfy both, maybe we can embed the link in the contextual part as part of a sentence, and also the CTA button uses the same URL but that would be a second occurrence of the same link? Actually the CTA button includes an . That’s a link. If we also include a link in the contextual part, that would be two tags, violating exactly 1 link. So we must have only one tag in the entire response. Therefore the CTA button must be the only link, and we cannot have any other link in the contextual part. But the instruction says “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual no texto”. Perhaps they consider the CTA button link as the contextual link? But it’s not “contextual” in the text; it’s in the CTA card. However maybe they consider the CTA button part of the text and it’s okay. To be safe, we can include the link only in the CTA button and not elsewhere. But we need to have exactly 1 link in the whole response. The CTA button includes the link; that’s okay. The instruction about “link contextual” maybe is optional? It says “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link contextual no texto usando a tag “Link_afiliado” (ex: convidando para conferir a edição).” That suggests we need to embed a link in the contextual text. But we also need the CTA button with a link. That would be 2 links. To resolve, maybe we can embed the same link in the contextual text as part of a sentence, but then the CTA button also uses the same link; that would be two tags with same href, which would be two links (two anchor tags). That violates exactly 1 link. So we need to decide which instruction takes precedence. The “REGRAS RIGIDAS DE LINKS” earlier: “Você tem permissão para criar no máximo de 1 a 2 links (tag ) ao longo de todo o seu texto.” Actually earlier they said up to 1 to 2 links, but then later “REGRAS CRUCIAIS DE FORMATAÇÃO HTML” says “Todo parágrafo corrido deve estar encapsulado em tags
. Não use Markdown…”. There’s no explicit limit now. But earlier they said “1 a 2 links (tag )”. However later they say “Insira EXATAMENTE 1 link de afiliado no texto”. So exactly 1 link. And also they require a CTA button with a link. That would be 1 link in the CTA button; maybe they consider that the only link allowed. So we should not add any other link in the contextual part. So we must embed the link only in the CTA button. But they also want a contextual link. Perhaps we can embed the link as part of the CTA button text? That’s still a link. The instruction “link contextual” may refer to the CTA button being the contextual link. Might be okay. Thus we will produce: first part: contextual paragraph
with max 3 lines, then bullet points every 2 paragraphs. We need bullet points after every 2 paragraphs. So structure: Paragraph1 (
… ), Paragraph2 (
… ), then bullet list (
- …
), then Paragraph3 (
… ), Paragraph4 (
… ), then bullet list again, etc. We need bullet points at least every 2 paragraphs. We can have bullet after paragraph2 and after paragraph4, etc. We need to keep each paragraph max 3 lines. We’ll write short sentences. We need to include exactly 1 link in the whole response, which will be the CTA button link. So we must not include any other tags. The bullet points should not contain links. We need to include the CTA card HTML immediately after the contextualization. The contextualization is the first part (RESPOSTA DIRETA & CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO). That includes the introductory paragraphs and bullet points. After that we insert the CTA card HTML. Thus flow: – Start with
paragraph (max 3 lines) delivering executive summary. – Then maybe second paragraph (
…) also max 3 lines. – Then bullet list (
- …
) summarizing topics. – Then third paragraph (
…) max 3 lines. – Then fourth paragraph (
…) max 3 lines. – Then bullet list again. – Then maybe fifth paragraph (
…) max 3 lines. – Then sixth paragraph (
…) max 3 lines. – Then bullet list again? Not required but can. We need to ensure bullet points every 2 paragraphs. So after paragraph2 we put bullet list, after paragraph4 bullet list, after paragraph6 bullet list maybe. We need to keep each paragraph max 3 lines. We’ll keep them short. We need to embed the link exactly once, in the CTA button. The CTA button includes Ver Amostra Grátis e Preço na Amazon. That’s the only link. We must not use any other tags. We must not use any other formatting like headings etc. Only
,
,,- , ,
,,, ,. The CTA card uses
,,
, . Those tags are not in the allowed list? The allowed tags list includes
? Actually they said “Escreva EXCLUSIVAMENTE utilizando tags HTML limpas:,
,,- , ,
,,, ,.” So we cannot use
,
| , | ,
|
|---|
